Can Equity Volatility Explain the Global Loan Pricing Puzzle?∗

نویسندگان

  • Lewis Gaul
  • Pinar Uysal
چکیده

We examine whether equity volatility can explain the difference in syndicated corporate loan spreads paid by U.S. and European borrowers first documented by Carey and Nini (2007). We argue that OLS estimates of the association between equity volatility and loan spreads are biased and inconsistent. We suggest instrumental variables that potentially identify consistent estimates. Our instrumental variable results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference in loan spreads paid by U.S. and European borrowers, and that OLS estimates of the association between idiosyncratic equity volatility and corporate loan spreads are biased downward by about a factor of 5. JEL codes: E40, G12, G15, G21 In this paper we examine whether equity volatility can explain the difference in syndicated corporate loan spreads between the U.S. and Europe documented by previous research. Carey and Nini (2007) provide evidence that interest rates spreads in Europe are 30 basis points ∗The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the U.S. Department of the Treasury. †Financial Economist, Policy Analysis Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E St. SW, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20219, e-mail: [email protected] ‡Post-doctoral Fellow, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Chair of International Finance, Station 5, Office ODY 2.17, CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, e-mail: [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Market Volatility Puzzle with Regard to the Systematic Risk of Bubble in the Securities Market of Iran

Stock market volatility is evaluated by measuring the variance of the market that is evaluated through consumption growth volatility in the framework of pricing of CCAPM models. This theory is not consistent with revealed facts, in reality; because consumption growth is very smooth but stock market appears highly volatile; this is famous to stock market volatility puzzle. In this regard, the ne...

متن کامل

Reassessing the Equity Premium Puzzle Using Micro Data

I investigate empirically the ability of financial market incompleteness to help explaining the equity premium puzzle. I estimate the non-diversifiable component of the cross-sectional volatility of income and examine its cyclical properties. Equipped with these estimates, I compute the implied equilibrium Sharpe-ratio of excess returns and evaluate the ability of idiosyncratic risk to improve ...

متن کامل

Essays on bankruptcy, credit risk and asset pricing

In this dissertation, I consider a range of topics in bankruptcy, credit risk and asset pricing. The first chapter proposes a structural-equilibrium model to examine some economic implications arising from voluntary filing of Chapter 11. The results suggest that conflict of interests (between debtors and creditors) arising from the voluntary filing option causes countercyclical losses in firm v...

متن کامل

Examination‌ of Equity Premium Puzzle by Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model with Fuzzy Nested Regimes: Evidence from Iran

The aim of this study is to examine the equity premium puzzle in Iran for the quarterly period of 1993-2016. In this regard, the hybrid bivariate Garch model and also fuzzy dummy variables with consumption capital asset pricing model (C-CAPM) have been used. The results of study show that using C-CAPM within fuzzy dummy variables (CCAPM-F), the relative risk aversion coefficient of investor is ...

متن کامل

Anchoring Heuristic and the Equity Premium Puzzle

I model a scenario in which investors do not know the payoff distributions of relatively newer firms and use the payoff distribution of similar well-established firms as starting points. The starting distributions are then adjusted for size, volatility, and other differences. Anchoring bias (Tversky and Kahneman (1974)) implies that such adjustments typically fall short. I show that adjusting c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011